Lima v. Chambers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that identity of intervening uninsured motorist carrier should be made known to jury and that insurer must disclose to its insured that their respective interests may be conflicting
• holding that identity of intervening uninsured motorist carrier should be made known to jury and that insurer must disclose to its insured that their respective interests may be conflicting
• stating that rule 24(a) permits intervention only if \the applicant is or may be bound by a judgment in the action\
• determining that pro se defendant would not provide adequate representation of intervenor’s interests
• Intervening insurer in tort action \must not be allowed to use against its insured any information whatsoever gained by reason of the insurer-insured relationship.\
• reversing trial court's denial of intervention but not stating standard of review for that reversal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).