Skip to main content
· 6/9/2009

Lima v. Addeco

Citations

  • 634 F. Supp. 2d 394
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48807
  • 2009 WL 1608909

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that for a defendant to be a joint employer under the ADA, the plaintiff must allege “commonality of hiring, firing, discipline, pay, insurance, records, and supervision”
  • “Even where two companies are deemed a joint employer, however, it is not necessarily the case that both are liable for discriminatory conduct in violation of Title VIL”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.