Lim v. Bitton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding when examination relied on by BVA failed to discuss impact of pain on functional loss
• remanding because “it was necessary for the BVA to address both the existence and extent of [the] appellant’s pain, as well as any limitation of motion due to his service-connected disabilities”
• remanding because “it was necessary for the BVA to address both the existence and extent of appellant’s pain, as well as any limitation of motion due to his service connected disabilities”
• Board decision “specifically noted the limitation of motion” but “failed to make any findings as to the extent of the appellant’s pain on motion” pursuant to §§ 4.40 and 4.45 (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).