Lily-Tulip Cup Corp. v. Home Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding constitutional prohibition against use of statements taken without notice to defense counsel, buttressing suppression and reversal with discussion of DR 7-104(A)(1) violation
• discussing right to counsel rule “grounded in this State's constitutional and statutory guarantees”
• civil case; exclusion of evidence is not proper remedy for a violation of DR 7-104(A)(1) absent infringement of constitutional rights
• once attorney enters proceeding, police may not question defendant in absence of counsel without affirmative waiver of right to counsel, made in presence of an attorney
• “once counsel enters the proceedings”, state constitution permits waiver only in the presence of counsel.
• civil case; exclusion of evidence is not proper remedy for a violation of DR 7-104(A)(l) absent infringement of constitutional rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).