Skip to main content
· 10/5/2015

Lilly v. Lewiston-Porter Cent. Sch. Dist.

Citations

  • 136 S. Ct. 156
  • 193 L. Ed. 2d 44
  • 84 U.S.L.W. 3166
  • 2015 U.S. LEXIS 5556

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a preponderance of the evidence supported finding a substantial risk of harm to a minor when defendant manufactured methamphetamine in a shed attached to a residence that housed a daycare
  • upholding enhancement where the defendant conspired to manufacture meth in a shed attached to a home where a co-conspirator’s wife ran a daycare center, when officers found meth paraphernalia and encountered thick fumes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.