· 6/30/2014
Lilly v. Heard
Citations
- 295 Ga. 399
- 761 S.E.2d 46
- 2014 WL 2924952
- 2014 Ga. LEXIS 536
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defining a “privy” as “one who is represented at trial and who is in law so connected with a party to the judgment as to have such an identity of interest that the party to the judgment represented the same legal right” (quotation omitted)
- privity exists where common interest is a matter of public concern
- “A privy is generally defined as one who is represented at trial and who is in law so connected with a party to the judgment as to have such an identity of interest that the party to the judgment represented the same legal right.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hunstein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.