Skip to main content
· 6/30/2014

Lilly v. Heard

Citations

  • 295 Ga. 399
  • 761 S.E.2d 46
  • 2014 WL 2924952
  • 2014 Ga. LEXIS 536

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defining a “privy” as “one who is represented at trial and who is in law so connected with a party to the judgment as to have such an identity of interest that the party to the judgment represented the same legal right” (quotation omitted)
  • privity exists where common interest is a matter of public concern
  • “A privy is generally defined as one who is represented at trial and who is in law so connected with a party to the judgment as to have such an identity of interest that the party to the judgment represented the same legal right.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.