Lilly v. Caroline County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff landowner’s failure to timely appeal the underlying zoning administrator’s decision to the BZA triggered the thing-decided doctrine’s application
• noting that “[t]here is no requirement in the statute that the administrator’s decision be in writing”
• dismissal of declaratory judgment action based on failure to file appeal with board of zoning appeals
• finding notice claims waived because plaintiffs “were present and participated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).