Lilly Bella, LLC and Charosalyn Ludden v. Igor Sivokozov

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting, as one thread of age discrimination evidence, testimony of fellow employee’s statement that plaintiff was fired because he was not part of the company’s “new wave or new movement.”
• “Having been granted reinstatement, [the plaintiff] cannot also receive an award of front pay.”
• affirming reinstatement order where any animosity was eradicated inasmuch as employees responsible for the friction that precipitated lawsuit would dog the school districts if plaintiffs were returned to their positions
• liquidated damages not appropriate when plaintiff's only evidence of intent is that employer’s reason for discharge was pretextual
• liquidated damages not appropriate when plaintiff's only evidence of intent is that employer's reason for discharge was pretextual
• City circulation manager's statements that the plaintiff was \an old fuddy-duddy\ constituted direct evidence that the defendant's reason for discharging the plaintiff was a pretext for age discrimination.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).