Skip to main content
· 4/6/2022

LILLIAN SINGLETON, Plaintiff-Respondent v. SHEILA SINGLETON

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that claims are barred when they “essentially allege the same elements as the negligence claims” (quoting McDonough v. Marr Scaffolding Co., 412 Mass. 636, 642 )
  • granting summary judgment on 93A claim premised on breach of warranty claims which were barred as a matter of law by statute of repose
  • designer of hydraulic lift was protected actor because the lift had been made according to specifications provided by customer
  • custom-made hydraulic lift, designed to specifications of its destination, was particularized improvement for particular piece of real property
  • statute protected a supplier of a hydraulic lift who provided individualized expertise and services, collaborated in its design, supervised its installation, and specified and supervised building modifications
  • installation of a hydraulic lift for material handling in a facility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Jennifer R. Growcock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.