Lillegraven v. Tengs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A statutory limitation on the time for commencing actions is generally considered to be a matter of procedure.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Webb v. City and Borough of Sitka
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1977-03-21· cited 119×
• Wilson v. Pollet
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1966-07-08· cited 52×
• Byrne v. Ogle
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1971-09-24· cited 45×
• Armstrong v. Armstrong
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1968-06-07· cited 33×
• Douglas v. Beneficial Finance Co. of Anchorage
  D. Alaska· 1971-09-02· cited 27×
• Palmer G. Lewis Co. v. ARCO Chemical Co.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1995-10-20· cited 26×
• Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp.
  D. Alaska· 1977-04-18· cited 16×
• McKean v. Hammond
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1968-10-07· cited 12×
• Hamilton v. Seattle Marine & Fishing Supply Co.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1977-04-01· cited 8×
• Scott v. Briggs Way Co.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1996-01-19· cited 3×
• Hakensen v. Ennis
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1978-10-13· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Richards v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1962-02-26· cited 1,608×
• Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1944-02-28· cited 781×
• Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Harriman
  Supreme Court· 1913-03-10· cited 348×
• Davis v. Mills
  Supreme Court· 1904-05-16· cited 237×
• Ransom v. Haner
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1961-05-16· cited 121×
• Scheer v. Rockne Motors Corporation
  Second Circuit· 1934-02-05· cited 29×
• Julia T. Cellini v. Edward K. Moss
  D.C. Circuit· 1956-04-05· cited 25×
• Baldwin v. Brown
  E.D. Michigan· 1962-02-08· cited 8×