Court of Appeals of Georgia· 8/3/2011
Liles v. State
Citations
- 716 S.E.2d 228
- 311 Ga. App. 355
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendant’s consent to search was not mere acquiescence to a claim of lawful authority, where there was testimony that the officer never asked for his consent and that the defendant had volunteered to allow the search
- defendant’s consent to search was not mere acquiescence to a claim of lawful authority, where there was testimony that the officer never asked for his consent and that the defendant had volunteered to allow the search
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ellington, Miller, Doyle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Corey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-03-13· cited 18×
- Durden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-03-08· cited 8×
- Travis Joe Little v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2020-02-12
- Steve Durden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-03-08
- Charlette Zeigler Corey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-03-13
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Code v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1975-04-08· cited 72×
- Love v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-03-24· cited 48×
- Welchel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-05-28· cited 25×
- Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-03-24· cited 19×
- Silverio v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-10-13· cited 14×
- Maloy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-09-23· cited 10×
- Esposito v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-09-17· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.