Skip to main content
· 10/23/1985

Liles v. Employers Mutual Insurance

Citations

  • 126 Wis. 2d 492
  • 377 N.W.2d 214
  • 1985 Wisc. App. LEXIS 3767

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the State’s suggestion that, because the appellant had not argued the issue of the sufficiency of the evidence before the trial court in connection with his motion for new trial, the issue was not properly before this Court on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Nettesheim, Scott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.