Lile v. Kincaid

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• landowner’s testimony on cross-examination regarding purchase price 8 years before condemnation “would not have been competent” in case-in-chief because too remote; court did not err in refusing to admit cancelled checks to corroborate landowner’s testimony
• landowner's testimony on cross-examination regarding purchase price 8 years before condemnation \would not have been competent\ in case in chief because too remote; court did not err in refusing to admit cancelled checks to corroborate landowner's testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).