Ligon v. Deloitte, Haskins & Sells

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that foreclosing damages remedy would interfere with \compelling federal interest in ensuring that employee benefit plan participants and beneficiaries obtain the benefits to which they are entitled\
• recognizing that foreclosing damages remedy would interfere with “compelling federal interest in ensuring that employee benefit plan participants and beneficiaries obtain the benefits to which they are entitled”
• holding that ERISA is the exclusive remedy for a fraud claim which meets the relation requirement to an employee benefit plan governed by ERISA
• holding that “constructive knowledge suffices” to establish knowledge of a fiduciary’s breach of duty and citing § 876
• stating that § 1132(g) provides for recovery of double interest in delinquent-contributions cases
• noting Restatement rule that a defendant may be chargeable with notice either as to fiduciary’s status as trustee or that trustee is committing breach of trust

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).