Skip to main content
· 4/27/1981

Lightcsy v. Sumner

Citations

  • 451 U.S. 940
  • 101 S. Ct. 2023
  • 68 L. Ed. 2d 328
  • 49 U.S.L.W. 3807
  • 1981 U.S. LEXIS 1874

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • party claiming privilege must provide party seeking discovery with the basis for contesting the claim
  • a “blanket objection” to each document on the ground of attorney-client privilege with no further description is clearly insufficient
  • blanket, non-specific objections raised on the bases of privilege are improper and may waive the privilege; party must specify evidence to which privilege applies
  • “Whether a responding party states a general objection to an entire discovery document on the basis of privilege, or generally asserts a privilege objection within an individual discovery response, the resulting ‘blanket objection’ is decidedly improper.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.