· 4/27/1981
Lightcsy v. Sumner
Citations
- 451 U.S. 940
- 101 S. Ct. 2023
- 68 L. Ed. 2d 328
- 49 U.S.L.W. 3807
- 1981 U.S. LEXIS 1874
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- party claiming privilege must provide party seeking discovery with the basis for contesting the claim
- a “blanket objection” to each document on the ground of attorney-client privilege with no further description is clearly insufficient
- blanket, non-specific objections raised on the bases of privilege are improper and may waive the privilege; party must specify evidence to which privilege applies
- “Whether a responding party states a general objection to an entire discovery document on the basis of privilege, or generally asserts a privilege objection within an individual discovery response, the resulting ‘blanket objection’ is decidedly improper.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.