Light v. Weldarc Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• danger posed of safety glasses slipping causing particle to penetrate user’s eye obvious as a matter of law
• summary judgment on strict liability claim improper because a genuine factual dispute existed as to the unreasonably dangerous condition of the safety glasses used
• “Whether Weldarc breached its duty of care in designing the glasses without some type of ‘anti-slip’ safety device and whether the glasses, as designed, were reasonably safe for their intended use are questions of fact precluding summary judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).