Lifschultz v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding importance of testimony factor weighed against preclusion because proffered testimony would be highly probative of material facts and would carry substantial weight
• finding importance of testimony factor weighed against preclusion because proffered testimony would be highly probative of material facts and would carry substantial weight
• “Court concludes that Rule 37(c)(1)'s automatic preclusionary sanction is not triggered because there is no basis on the record before the Court on which to find that permitting Grieco to testify would unjustly harm Design.”
• “Court concludes that Rule 37(c)(1)'s automatic preclusionary sanction is not triggered because there is no basis on the record before the Court on which to find that permitting Grieco to testify would unjustly harm Design.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).