Lifschultz Fast Freight, Inc. v. Haynsworth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court's prior ruling allowing counsel to withdraw is the \law ofthe case\ in subsequent case for breach of duty based on that withdrawal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lifschultz Fast Freight, Inc. v. Haynsworth, Marion, McKay & Guérard
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-02-08· cited 8×
• Schibel v. Eymann
  Washington Supreme Court· 2017-08-03

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Stone v. Bethea
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1968-04-29· cited 51×
• JKT Co., Inc. v. Hardwick
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-02-27· cited 48×
• Wallace v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1989-11-13· cited 30×
• Lifschultz Fast Freight, Inc. v. Consolidated Freightways Corp. of Delaware
  D. South Carolina· 1992-11-19· cited 19×
• Hutson v. Continental Assurance Co.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-09-01· cited 17×
• Professional Bankers Corp. v. Floyd
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-05-21· cited 15×
• Scott v. McCain
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1978-12-13· cited 13×
• Lott v. Ayres
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1980-12-22· cited 12×
• Washington v. Rucker
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-02-18· cited 7×