· 9/21/2000
Life Technologies, Inc. v. Clontech Laboratories, Inc.,defendant-Appellee
Citations
- 224 F.3d 1320
- 56 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1186
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 23620
- 2000 WL 1363713
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he path that leads an inventor to the invention is expressly made irrelevant to patentability by statute.”
- “Reasonable expectation of success is assessed from the perspective of the person of ordinary skill in the art.”
- “Materiality and intent to deceive are distinct factual inquiries, and each must be shown by clear and convincing evidence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Michel, Bryson, Gajarsa
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.