Skip to main content
· 9/21/2000

Life Technologies, Inc. v. Clontech Laboratories, Inc.,defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 224 F.3d 1320
  • 56 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1186
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 23620
  • 2000 WL 1363713

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he path that leads an inventor to the invention is expressly made irrelevant to patentability by statute.”
  • “Reasonable expectation of success is assessed from the perspective of the person of ordinary skill in the art.”
  • “Materiality and intent to deceive are distinct factual inquiries, and each must be shown by clear and convincing evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Michel, Bryson, Gajarsa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.