Life of the Land v. Burns

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, ordinarily, “ ‘courts will not consume time deciding abstract propositions of law or moot cases, and have no jurisdiction to do so[]’ ” (quoting Territory v. Aldridge, 35 Haw. 565, 568 (1940))
• “appellees failed to show that the subject complained of could ‘reasonably be expected to recur’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).