Life of the Land, Inc. v. Land Use Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff was an aggrieved party within the meaning of the Hawai`i Administrative Procedures Act (HAPA
• holding that plaintiff was an aggrieved party within the meaning of the Hawaii Administrative Procedures Act (HAPA
• recognizing that persons living near property sought to be reclassified and those with \personal\ and \special\ \aesthetic and environmental interests\ are \person[s] aggrieved\ pursuant to HRS § 91-14(a)
• recognizing that persons living near property sought to be i-eclassified and those with “personal” and “special” “aesthetic and environmental interests” are “person[s] aggrieved” pursuant to HRS § 91-14(a)
• holding that Life of the Land had standing to appeal from Land Use Commission's decision where its representative submitted written comments to, and testified at public hearing before, the commission
• holding there are “two basic requirements” for standing to appeal an agency decision: “first, one must be a person aggrieved and second, the aggrieved party must have participated in a contested case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).