Life Ins. Co. of Georgia v. Meeks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that class certification was inappropriate because of the individualized questions required
• “In general, claims of fraud based upon oral misrepresentations are not appropriate for class treatment because the reliance element must be proved factually for each individual class member.”
• when the named plaintiff has no valid claim against the defendant, he is not eligible to represent the class because he cannot meet adequacy requirement
• when the named plaintiff has no valid claim against the defendant, he is not eligible to represent the class because he cannot meet adequacy requirement
• “When entered, the pretrial order supersedes the pleadings and controls the subsequent scope and course of the action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).