Life & Cas. Ins. Co. of Tennessee v. Padgett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an argument and assault arising from an employee’s attempt to collect money was not unexpectable
• holding there was substantial evidence to support finding employee’s assault of a customer was within the scope of employment because “[f]or a quarrel to arise in the course of an employee’s attempt to collect money is certainly ‘not unexpectable’”
• wherein a dispute was not unexpectable where there was an employment duty to collect money

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).