Skip to main content
· 7/1/1859

Liening v. Gould

Citations

  • 13 Cal. 598
  • 1859 Cal. LEXIS 211

Syllabus

<p>Pleadings in Justices’ Courts are not held to much strictness. Where plaintiff avers he is administrator in fact of the intestate, and this is not denied in the answer, no further proof of plaintiff’s right to sue is requisite.</p> <p>Paying part of a ¡note when all is due is no consideration for an agreement to extend the time of payment.</p> <p>If, after verdict, no motion he made for new trial, the Supreme Court will not review the testimony.</p>

Judges: Baldwin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.