Lienhart v. Dryvit Systems, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “‘a class representative must be part of the class and possess the same interest and suffer the same injury as the class members’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gunnells v. Healthplan Services, Inc.
  Fourth Circuit· 2003-10-30· cited 231×
• In Re Lorazepam & Clorazepate Antitrust Litigation
  D.C. Circuit· 2002-05-14· cited 82×
• James v. PacifiCorp
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-01-25· cited 1×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor
  Supreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 4,991×
• General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. Falcon
  Supreme Court· 1982-06-14· cited 4,068×
• In Re American Medical Systems, Inc. Pfizer, Inc.
  Sixth Circuit· 1996-02-15· cited 761×
• Valentino v. Carter-Wallace, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1996-10-07· cited 398×
• In the Matter of Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Incorporated
  Seventh Circuit· 1995-04-27· cited 358×
• Broussard v. Meineke Discount Muffler Shops, Inc.
  Fourth Circuit· 1998-08-19· cited 243×
• Windham v. American Brands, Inc.
  Fourth Circuit· 1977-10-11· cited 184×
• Stott v. Haworth
  Fourth Circuit· 1990-10-04· cited 136×
• Lienhart v. Dryvit Systems, Inc.
  Fourth Circuit· 2001-06-26· cited 28×
• In re Stucco Litigation
  E.D. North Carolina· 1997-08-12· cited 17×
• Lee v. Crest Chemical Co.
  M.D. North Carolina· 1984-02-09· cited 7×