Skip to main content
· 9/28/2006

Lien Huynh v. Chase Manhattan Bank

Citations

  • 465 F.3d 992
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 24371

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the 2 Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws applied where jurisdiction based on U.S.C. § 632
  • finding that federal 24 common law dictates that the law of the forum governs statute of limitations issues in federal 25 question cases
  • explaining that the forum will apply its own state’s statute of limitations 14 barring exceptional circumstances and constitutional restrictions
  • explaining that when federal jurisdiction is not based on diversity of citizenship, “federal common law choice-of-law rules apply”
  • explaining that a complaint may be dismissed on statute of limitations grounds so long as the running of the limitation period is apparent on the face of the complaint
  • noting plaintiffs did not allege any extraordinary circumstances 20 beyond their control that made filing timely “impossible”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nelson, O'Scannlain, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.