Liebsch v. Abbott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The general rule is that a party who wishes to rescind an agreement must place the opposite party in status quo.\
• if the trial court’s decision is correct, the appellate court can sustain it for a different reason
• procedures of section 559.21 did not apply because contract performance was contingent upon buyer obtaining a $20,000 mortgage loan
• “The general rule is that a party who wishes to rescind an agreement must place the opposite party in status quo.”
• “[Section] 559.21 contemplates contracts of actual purchase and not agreements wholly dependent upon some contingency.”
• “The general rule is that a party who wishes to rescind an agreement must place the opposite party in status quo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).