Liebig v. Liebig

Citations

• 107 Wash. 464
• 182 P. 605
• 1919 Wash. LEXIS 800

Syllabus

<p>Appeal (71) —• Decisions Reviewable—-Reducing Alimony. An order reducing alimony is an order affecting a substantial right and therefore appealable.</p> <p>Same (67)—Decisions Reviewable—Receiveks. An order refusing to appoint a receiver is an order from which an appeal may be taken under the statute.</p> <p>Same (3-79, 380)—Review—Inteblocutoby Oedebs—Appeal Feom Final Judgment ob Specific Oedeb. Rem. Code, § 1716, providing that an appeal from a final judgment shall bring up for review any order made in the same action or proceeding, refers to interlocutory orders occurring in the trial of the case; and an appeal from an order quashing a writ of garnishment to enforce a judgment of alimony does not bring up for review prior orders made reducing the alimony or refusing to appoint a receiver in prior proceedings relating to the alimony and its enforcement.</p> <p>Garnishment (55)-—-Quashing—Failure to File Bond. A writ of garnishment is properly quashed where it was sued out to collect unpaid alimony, for which there was no judgment in any specific amount, and the plaintiff failed to give any bond, as required by Rem. Code, J 681, in case the garnishment was based on Id., § 680, subdiv. 2, authorizing a garnishment where plaintiff sues for a debt and makes affidavit that such debt is just, due and unpaid.</p>