Skip to main content
· 2/23/1993

Liebig v. DeJoy

Citations

  • 814 F. Supp. 1074
  • 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2109
  • 1993 WL 51753

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Notice of Removal is improper where a federal court lacks subject matter jurisdiction
  • explaining that the thirty–day limit in § 1446(b) is “mandatory and may not be extended by the court.”
  • awarding just costs, actual expenses and attorney fees where subject matter jurisdiction was lacking

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kovachevich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.