Lieberman v. Cambridge Partners, L.L.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• proceeding to review whether the Sarbanes-Oxley Act had an impermissible retroactive effect after concluding it lacked a clear directive from Congress
• “We do not decide . . . whether Congress intended Section 804 14 (2) the statute of repose must begin as of the date of the merger (Nov. 30, 1999) between Exxon and Mobil, not the date that the joint proxy statement was issued (Mar. 26, 1999); and (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).