Skip to main content
· 8/27/1990

Lidy v. Sullivan

Citations

  • 745 F. Supp. 1411
  • 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11474
  • 1989 WL 224947

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the court will only consider remanding the case to a new ALJ if “(1) the plaintiff has requested remand to a different ALJ; and (2) there is some legitimate, compelling reason to have a different ALJ perform the ordered task on remand.”
  • stating that the court will only 24 consider remanding the case to a new ALJ if “(1) the plaintiff has requested remand to a different 25 ALJ; and (2) there is some legitimate, compelling reason to have a different ALJ perform the 26 ordered task on remand.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKINNEY

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.