Skip to main content
· 11/18/1929

Lichty v. Faisst

Citations

  • 21 S.W.2d 958
  • 180 Ark. 428
  • 1929 Ark. LEXIS 308

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding, as a factual matter, that good title was conveyed where the stipulated condition did not constitute a reversionary clause
  • clause stating that when ceased to be used for school purposes the grantor or anyone else owning land could have land at specific price of $60 was not reverting clause, but was option clause permitting grantor to repurchase land upon the happening of a contingency

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kirby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.