Lichtman v. RECOGNITION EQUIPMENT, INCORPORATED

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• claimant cannot introduce evidence of the value of stock options lost due to the merger

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Alabama By-Products Corp. v. Cede & Co. Ex Rel. Shearson Lehman Bros.
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1995-04-27· cited 59×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,447 S. William Green v. Santa Fe Industries, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1976-02-18· cited 54×
• Kaye v. Pantone, Inc.
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1978-11-13· cited 27×
• Nelson v. Frank E. Best Inc.
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2000-08-09· cited 17×
• In Re Arthur Treacher's Fish & Chips of Ft. Lauderdale, Inc.
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1978-05-10· cited 10×
• Jones v. Dickerson
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1974-12-10· cited 3×
• Andaloro v. PFPC Worldwide, Inc.
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2003-09-12· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Southern Production Co. v. Sabath
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1952-03-12· cited 33×
• In re Northeastern Water Co.
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1944-08-30· cited 27×
• Meade v. Pacific Gamble Robinson Co.
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1947-02-14· cited 15×