Lichtenstein v. Silverman
Citations
- 30 Ohio C.C. Dec. 66
- 28 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 126
Syllabus
<p>INJUNCTION — PARTNERSHIP.</p> <p>Kinkade, Richards and Chittenden, JJ., of the sixth district sitting by • designation.</p> <p>Window Cleaning not Unique or Extraordinary Work Against which Former Partner May Enioin.</p> <p>Injunction will not lie against one who has provided himself with a bucket and ladder and is engaging, without the assistance of employes, in the work of cleaning windows, contrary to a partnership agreement theretofore entered into, where it does not appear that he has solicited or proposes to solicit the work of any of the customers of the plaintiff, his former partner, the work being common labor and in no sense special, unique or extraordinary.</p> <p>fSvllabus by the court.]</p>
Judges: Chittenden, Kinkade, Richards
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.