New York Supreme Court· 3/21/1997
Lichtenstein v. Emerson
Citations
- 171 Misc. 2d 933
- 656 N.Y.S.2d 180
- 1997 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 85
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- interpreting Section 470 as requiring a “bona fide office” and finding that counsel had failed to comply with Section 470 where he maintained as an office a room in the basement of a restaurant owned by a corporation in which he was a shareholder
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lehner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Elm Management Corp. v. SprungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2006-10-17· cited 20×
- Schoenefeld v. State of New YorkSecond Circuit· 2014-04-08· cited 16×
- Lichtenstein v. EmersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1998-06-09· cited 11×
- Neal v. Energy Transportation Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2002-07-11· cited 7×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Toomer v. WitsellSupreme Court· 1948-10-11· cited 671×
- Supreme Court of NH v. PiperSupreme Court· 1985-03-04· cited 294×
- Hicklin v. OrbeckSupreme Court· 1978-06-22· cited 258×
- Supreme Court of Virginia v. FriedmanSupreme Court· 1988-06-20· cited 132×
- In re GordonNew York Court of Appeals· 1979-11-13· cited 56×
- McGee v. KormanNew York Court of Appeals· 1987-08-27· cited 39×
- Salla v. County of MonroeNew York Court of Appeals· 1979-11-29· cited 27×
- In re the Estate of ScarsellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1993-07-12· cited 10×
- White River Paper Co. v. Ashmont Tissue, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York· 1981-08-17· cited 7×
- Rosenshein v. ErnstoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1991-10-31· cited 6×
- Keenan v. Mitsubishi Estate, New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1996-06-20· cited 6×
- In re the Estate of FordanNew York Surrogate's Court· 1956-11-16· cited 6×
- Rosenberg v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.New York Supreme Court· 1979-05-09· cited 5×
- Austria v. ShawNew York Supreme Court· 1989-06-14· cited 5×
- Park Lane Commercial Corp. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.New York Supreme Court· 1966-04-18· cited 4×
- Cheshire Academy v. LeeCivil Court of the City of New York· 1982-02-22· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.