Liberty Warranty Corp. v. Fuccillo Automotive Group, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, under Minnesota law, to establish common law fraud, a party must prove “(1) a false representation of a past or existing material fact susceptible of knowledge; (2
• declining to determine content of common law fiduciary duties of majority shareholder of closely-held corporation because shareholders failed to demonstrate a breach even under standard they advocated
• explaining that the elements of common law fraud under Minnesota law are: “(1) a false representation of a past or existing material fact susceptible of knowledge; (2) made with knowledge of the falsity of the representation or made without knowing whether it was true or false; (3
• noting a common-law claim of fraud requires proof of a false representation
• analyzing claim of unfairly prejudicial conduct arising from reverse stock split
• to prove a common law fraud claim, plaintiff must prove reliance and pecuniary loss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).