Skip to main content
· 8/25/2004

Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Black & Decker Corp.

Citations

  • 383 F. Supp. 2d 200
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17444
  • 2004 WL 1941351

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • predicting that the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court “would find that pre-notice defense costs are recoverable absent prejudice”
  • concluding “that the question of when the duty arises is distinct from when the duty is breached, and in a state [that] ... requires prejudice for the late notice defense[,] notice is deemed an independent obligation of the insured, not a condition precedent to coverage”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Woodlock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.