· 8/25/2004
Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Black & Decker Corp.
Citations
- 383 F. Supp. 2d 200
- 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17444
- 2004 WL 1941351
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- predicting that the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court “would find that pre-notice defense costs are recoverable absent prejudice”
- concluding “that the question of when the duty arises is distinct from when the duty is breached, and in a state [that] ... requires prejudice for the late notice defense[,] notice is deemed an independent obligation of the insured, not a condition precedent to coverage”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Woodlock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.