Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Ward Trucking Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “federal courts have an ever-present obligation to satisfy themselves of their subject-matter jurisdiction and to decide the issue sua sponte”
• noting that “federal courts have an ever-present obligation to satisfy themselves of their subject-matter jurisdiction and to decide the issue sua sponte”
• noting that the federal courts’ “ever-present obligation to satisfy themselves of their subject matter jurisdiction and to decide the issue sua sponte applies equally in removal cases”
• noting that the federal courts’ “ever-present obligation to satisfy themselves of their subject matter jurisdiction and to decide the issue sua sponte applies equally in removal cases”
• observing district courts’ “obligation to satisfy themselves of their subject matter jurisdiction and to decide the issue sua sponte” applies in removal cases
• stating “the general rule that federal courts have an ever- present obligation to satisfy themselves of their subject matter jurisdiction and to decide the issue sua sponte ... in removal cases”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).