Skip to main content
· 4/12/2000

Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Farm, Inc.

Citations

  • 754 So. 2d 865
  • 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4294
  • 2000 WL 368593

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a discovery order requiring disclosure of the insurer’s business practices was premature without a determination of the coverage issue
  • holding that a discovery order in a bad faith action requiring disclosure of the insurer's business practices was premature without a determination of the coverage issue
  • holding that a discovery order in a bad faith action requiring disclosure of the insurer's business practices was premature without a determination of the coverage issue
  • holding that a discovery order in a bad faith action requiring disclosure of the insurer's business practices was premature without a determination of the coverage issue
  • statutory bad-faith claim against a property insurer premature, unripe, and subject to dismissal when first-party coverage dispute had not been fully resolved
  • The court quashed an “order requiring the insurer to respond to discovery directed to the issue of insurer bad faith. Such discovery is premature until such time as the claim for statutory bad faith has accrued and been filed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cope, Shevin and Sorondo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.