Skip to main content
· 3/17/1999

Liberty Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company

Citations

  • 171 F.3d 818
  • 38 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 11
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 4255
  • 1999 WL 147361

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that an express warranty is created when “[t]he seller promises that the good sold will conform to some standard which may be established by a model, a level of quality, an assurance, a description or a list of specifications”
  • outlining consumer‐friendly presumptions in UCC definition of “part of the basis of the bargain” and vacating summary judgment for supplier despite undisputed evidence that additional consideration was paid for some extended warranties
  • noting that “a promise is presumed to be a ‘part of the basis of the bargain’ under New Jersey law once the buyer has become aware of the affirmation of fact or promise,” and remanding for trial as to the existence of an express warranty in post-sale, extended service plans
  • “a promise is presumed to be a ‘part of the basis of the bargain’ under New Jersey law ‘once the buyer has become aware of the affirmation of fact or promise’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Greenberg, Scirica, Carman, Trade

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.