· 2/4/2004
Liberty Life Assurance Co. v. Barbara Kennedy
Citations
- 358 F.3d 1295
- 32 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1034
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 1675
- 2004 WL 205843
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying de novo review when the plan administrator declined to exercise its discretionary authority to interpret benefit eligibility
- declining to “decide which document controls” where the terms of a life insurance plan and an SPD were “not irreconcilable”
- “Insurers who offer employee benefit plans under ERISA are free to allow policyholders to change beneficiaries through more than a single means and, so long as the policyholders are informed of the means and the plan administrator complies with its fiduciary obligations, ERISA is not implicated.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edmondson, Kravitch, Gibson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.