Liberty Fund, Inc. v. Chao

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a “substantial economic impact on any individual employer or employee” is not likely to significantly change the court’s unreasonableness assessment
• noting that the backlog of other pending applications was over 300,000
• finding in favor of agency where the agency’s “first-in, first out” processing of applications “would simply move petitioners to the front of the queue, at the expense of other similarly situated applicants”
• “[W]here resource allocation is the source of the delay, courts have declined to expedite action because of the impact on competing priorities.”
• “[W]here resource allocation is the source of the delay, courts have declined to expedite action because of the impact on competing priorities.”
• “[W]here resource allocation is the source of the delay, courts have declined to expedite action because of the impact on competing priorities.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).