Liberty Coins, LLC v. Porter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing the Board’s argument that “the need for oversight and supervisory efficiency” supported in-state requirement but nonetheless concluding requirement was waivable
• waiving requirement of clerkship “within this state” where applicant’s otherwise satisfactory clerkship experience was with licensed Vermont attorney in office just over Vermont border in New Hampshire
• overruling Board’s interpretation of Rule 6 as requiring applicants to complete clerkship in Vermont
• Supreme Court has original jurisdiction over appeals from the Board of Bar Examiners

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).