Skip to main content
· 1/12/2005

Liberty American Ins. Co. v. Kennedy

Citations

  • 890 So. 2d 539
  • 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 74
  • 2005 WL 50101

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “submission of the claim to appraisal does not foreclose Liberty American from challenging an element of loss as not being covered by the policy”
  • holding that “the court in Three Palms Pointe, Inc. misinterpreted the holding of Licea” and that “Licea made clear that the submission of a claim to appraisal does not foreclose an insurer’s subsequent challenge on an issue of coverage”
  • explaining that “the submission of [a] claim to appraisal does not foreclose . . . challenging an element of loss as not being covered by the policy”
  • concluding . 4 that “the submission of the claim to appraisal does not foreclose [the defendant] from challenging an element of loss as not being covered by the policy”
  • “[T]he submission of [a] 14 claim to appraisal does not foreclose [the insurer] from challenging an element of loss as 15 not being covered by the policy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Canady

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.