Libertarian Party v. Jay Dardenne

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “capable of repetition” exception did not apply because the Secretary’s actions did not involve governmental action done pursuant to an election statute
• relying on evidence developed in district court to affirm district court’s order that rejected applicability of “capable of repetition, yet evading review” exception and that dismissed case as moot
• relying on evidence developed in district court to affirm district court’s order that rejected applicability of “capable of repetition, yet evading review” exception and that dismissed case as moot
• requiring a party to demonstrate “‘either a demonstrated probability or a reasonable expectation’ that [it] will ‘be subject to the same [unlawful governmental] action again’” (alteration in original) (citation omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).