Libertarian Party New Hampshire v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, because any additional burdens upon the plaintiffs were reasonable, the State’s important regulatory interests were sufficient to justify those burdens
• holding that a three percent requirement for minor political parties did not create a severe burden
• holding ballot access statutes RSA 652:11, 655:40, and 655:40-a constitutional
• finding definition of party constitutional in the context of selecting ballot clerks because it depends on the neutral criterion of success at the polls

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).