· 1/17/1996
Libby v. Patterson
Citations
- 80 Wash. App. 1026
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the district court exceeded its jurisdiction to the extent it used additional evidence to rule upon issues beyond those presented to the ALJ
- stating “Title VII does not authorize a remedy against individuals for violations of its provisions”
- stating “Title VII does not authorize a remedy against individuals for violations of its provisions”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.