Skip to main content
· 1/17/1996

Libby v. Patterson

Citations

  • 80 Wash. App. 1026

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the district court exceeded its jurisdiction to the extent it used additional evidence to rule upon issues beyond those presented to the ALJ
  • stating “Title VII does not authorize a remedy against individuals for violations of its provisions”
  • stating “Title VII does not authorize a remedy against individuals for violations of its provisions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.