Skip to main content
· 11/26/1986

Libby v. Marshall

Citations

  • 653 F. Supp. 359
  • 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17186

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Later cases have made it even more clear that the relevant distinction for Eleventh Amendment purposes is that between a damage award and an injunction, not between one that would cost the state money and one that would not.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Skinner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.