Liban Ahmed Abdala v. Immigration and Naturalization Service Adele J. Fasano, Dist. Director, Ins District Director for the San Diego District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “a petitioner subject to the collateral consequence of a ten-year bar to reentry did not present a cognizable claim where the petitioner was also permanently barred from reentry on a wholly separate ground”
• holding that \a petitioner subject to the collateral consequence of a ten-year bar to reentry did not present a cognizable claim where the petitioner was also permanently barred from reentry on a wholly separate ground\
• holding that “for a habeas petition to continue to present a live controversy after the petitioner’s release or deportation . . . there must be some remaining ‘col- lateral consequence’ that may be redressed by success on the petition.”
• holding that “for a habeas petition to continue 15 to present a live controversy after the petitioner’s release or deportation . . . there must be some 16 remaining ‘collateral consequence’ that may be redressed by success on the petition.”
• holding that “for a habeas petition to continue to present 19 a live controversy after the petitioner’s release or deportation . . . there must be some remaining 20 ‘collateral consequence’ that may be redressed by success on the petition.”
• noting that mootness may arise \[a]t any stage of the proceedings\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).