Li v. Yan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that text of § 1631 allows transfer when court lacks either personal or subject-matter jurisdiction
• ruling that § 1631 permits “transfer where a court lacks either personal or subject matter jurisdiction”
• holding that text of § 1631 allows transfer when court lacks either personal or subject-matter jurisdiction
• concluding that Section 1631 “on its face does not plainly restrict a federal court’s authority to transfer an action to those cases in which it lacks subject matter jurisdiction”
• holding that § 1631 applies to defects 5 Due to this conclusion, the Court does not reach the issue of venue or address the substantive merits of CVS’s request for injunctive relief. of personal jurisdiction
• holding that Section 1631 authorizes transfer where transferring court lacks personal jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).